Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Dowell Mclaughlin, Steven Mclaughlin v. County of El Dorado

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (Sacramento Division)


August 30, 2011

DOWELL MCLAUGHLIN, STEVEN MCLAUGHLIN, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
COUNTY OF EL DORADO, ET AL DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Hon. Lawrence K. Karlton

ROBERT R. POWELL, ESQ. CSB#159747 DENNIS R. INGOLS, ESQ. CSB#236458 LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT R. POWELL 925 West Hedding Street San Jose, California 95126 T: 408-553-0200 F: 408-553-0203 E: admin@rrpassociates.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs DOWELL MCLAUGHLIN & STEVEN MCLAUGHLIN,

STIPULATION FOR ISSUANCE OF ORDER SHORTENING TIME Date: Time: Courtroom: 4

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs have reached a settlement that would resolve all claims between them and the City of South Lake Tahoe and its employee co-defendants, and;

WHEREAS, on August 25, 2011, Plaintiffs Dowell and Steven McLaughlin submitted an Ex-Parte Application for Approval of Minors' Compromise ("Petition"), and;

WHEREAS, the proposed settlement includes annuities for each of the Plaintiffs' three minor children, as set forth in the Petition, and;

WHEREAS, the proposed annuities must be funded by October 1st, 2011, at which point the quoted interest rates underlying the proposed annuity payouts expires, and;

WHEREAS, the Court's first available hearing date, based on the Court's availability and standard amount of notice under the Local Rules, is October 22nd, which is too late to allow the annuities to be funded in time; and

WHEREAS, while the settlement has already been approved by the South Lake Tahoe City Council, counsel for the City estimates it would take 14 days for a check to be processed and delivered to the office of the company handling the establishment of the proposed annuities, Ringler Associates, located in Walnut Creek, California; and

WHEREAS, the settling Defendants do no oppose the Petition;

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs have made every effort to provide the Court with all relevant information; the parties, through their counsel of record, do hereby stipulate as follows and respectfully request this Court order same:

1. The hearing on the Petition (Docket #19), is hereby scheduled for September 26, 2011, at 10:00 a.m.; and

2. Any responsive pleading by any Defendant must be e-filed by September 12, 2011.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

Based on the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefor, the Court hereby orders and finds as follows:

1. The hearing on the Petition (Docket #19), is hereby scheduled for September

26, 2011, at 10:00 a.m.;*fn1 and

2. Any responsive pleading by any Defendant must be e-filed by September 12, 2011.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.