UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
August 31, 2011
VICTOR GUTTMANN, KELLEY BRUNO, SONYA YRENE, AND REBECCA YUMUL, ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED,
THE QUAKER OATS COMPANY,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Richard Seeborg United States District Court Judge
ARNOLD & PORTER LLP THE WESTON FIRM ANGEL A. GARGANTA (163957) Gregory S. Weston (239944) 2 RACHEL L. CHANIN (229253) 888 Turquoise Street GEORGE F. LANGENDORF (255563) San Diego, CA 92109 3 MAULIK G. SHAH (255403) Phone: (858) 488-1672 One Embarcadero Center, 22nd Floor Fax: (480) 247-4553 4 San Francisco, CA 94111-3711 firstname.lastname@example.org Phone: (415) 356-3000 5 Fax: (415) 356-3099 Jack Fitzgerald (257370) Angel.Garganta@aporter.com 2811 Sykes Court 6 Rachel.Chanin@aporter.com Santa Clara, CA 95051 George.Langendorf@aporter.com Phone: (408) 459-0305 7 Maulik.Shah@aporter.com email@example.com 8 Attorneys for Defendant LAW OFFICES OF RONALD A. THE QUAKER OATS COMPANY MARRON, APLC 9 Ronald A. Marron (175650) 3636 4th Avenue, Suite 202 10 San Diego, CA 92103 Phone: (619) 696-9006 11 Fax: (619) 564-6665 firstname.lastname@example.org 12 Interim Class Counsel
Pleading Type: Class Action
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 20 ORDER TO SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE, EXTEND STAY OF DISCOVERY, AND CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE.
Sonya Yrene, and Rebecca Yumul ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant The Quaker Oats Company 3 WHEREAS, on June 14, 2011, the Court consolidated the matters Chacanaca, et al. v. The Quaker Oats Company, Case No. 5:10-cv-00502 RS; Yrene, et al. v. The Quaker Oats Company, 6
This Stipulation is entered into by and between Plaintiffs Victor Guttmann, Kelley Bruno, ("Quaker"), by and through their respective counsel.
Pelobello v. Quaker Oats Company, C 11-0093 RS, into one action, appointed the Weston Firm and 8 the Law Offices of Ronald A. Marron Interim Class Counsel, and ordered Plaintiffs to file a 9 consolidated complaint within ten days. (Doc. #94); 2011, directed the parties to file a Joint Case Management Statement at least one week prior to the
WHEREAS, on June 24, 2011, Plaintiffs filed a Consolidated Complaint. (Doc. #95);
WHEREAS, on July 29, 2011, pursuant to a stipulated briefing schedule, Quaker filed a 15 motion to dismiss the Consolidated Complaint (Doc. #98); 16 (Doc. #102);
as follows: 21
September 16, 2011. Plaintiffs' Opposition to Quaker's Motion to Dismiss the Amended 23 Dismiss is due on October 31, 2011.
Defendant's motion to dismiss the Amended Consolidated Complaint. 27 28
DISCOVERY, AND CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Case No. 5:10-cv-00502
WHEREAS, the Court also scheduled a Case Management Conference for September 15, Conference, and stayed discovery pending the Case Management Conference. (Doc. #94);
WHEREAS, on August 19, 2011, Plaintiffs filed an Amended Consolidated Complaint
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above, Plaintiffs and Quaker hereby stipulate
1. Quaker's Motion to Dismiss the Amended Consolidated Complaint is due on Consolidated Complaint is due on October 17, 2011. Quaker's Reply In Support of its Motion to
2. The stay of discovery shall remain in effect pending the Court's ruling on
3. The Case Management Conference scheduled for September 15, 2011 shall be taken
2 off calendar, to be rescheduled after the Court's ruling on Defendant's motion to dismiss the 3
Amended Consolidated Complaint.
IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD 6 7
PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED 21 22 23
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.