UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
August 31, 2011
JAS MAN RHEA ENTERPRISES, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, MANJIT SANDHU, MOHINDER SANDHU ETAL,"LP", A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, DBA
AUBURN GAS & FOOD, AND DOES ONE TO FIFTY, INCLUSIVE,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Morrison C. England, JR United States District Judge
Jason K. Singleton, State Bar #166170 email@example.com SINGLETON LAW GROUP 611 "L" Street, Suite A Eureka, CA 95501 (707) 441-1177 FAX 441-1533 Attorney for Plaintiff, JOSHUA LAMARK
STIPULATION TO ALLOW PLAINTIFF TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; ORDER THEREON
In reviewing his file, Plaintiff's counsel discovered his staff had made a clerical error in preparing the Complaint filed in this matter, specifically, paragraph 4 which lists the barriers to access which Plaintiff encountered at the facility which is the subject of this action has incorrect information in it. Plaintiff's counsel's office staff inadvertently inserted a list of access barriers from a report prepared by the access consultant for a different facility.
Plaintiff desires to file a First Amended Complaint to correct Paragraph 4 inserting the barriers to access encountered by Plaintiff at Auburn Gas & Food, the facility which is the subject of this action, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A."
Defendant Jas Man Rhea Enterprises stipulates that Plaintiff may file the First Amended Complaint and that Defendant Jas Man Rhea Enterprises shall not be required to file an answer to the First Amended Complaint, their Answer filed July 15, 2011, as Document 7 is accepted as responsive to the First Amended Complaint.
It is so stipulated.
Based on the foregoing stipulation and good cause appearing,
1. Plaintiff may file a First Amended Complaint.
2. Defendant JAS MAN RHEA ENTERPRISES shall not be required to file an Answer to the Amended Complaint, their Answer filed July 15, 2011, is accepted as responsive to the Amended Complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.