IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
August 31, 2011
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Hon. Garland E. Burrell Jr.
DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424 Federal Defender MATTHEW M. SCOBLE, Bar# 237432 Assistant Federal Defender 801 I Street, 3rd Floor Sacramento, California 95814 Telephone (916) 498-5700 Attorney for Defendant LAURA VANNOY
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DATE: September 30, 2011 TIME: 9:00 a.m.
It is hereby stipulated and agreed to between the United States of America through MATT G. MORRIS, Assistant U.S. Attorney, and defendant, LAURA VANNOY, by and through her counsel, MATTHEW M. SCOBLE, Assistant Federal Defender, that the status conference set for Friday, September 2, 2011, be continued to Friday, September 30, 2011, at 9:00 a.m..
The reason for this continuance is to allow defense counsel additional time to review discovery with the defendant, to examine possible defenses and to continue investigating the facts of the case.
It is further stipulated that the time period from the date of this stipulation, August 29, 2011, through and including the date of the new status conference hearing, September 30, 2011, shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161 (h)(7)(B)(iv)and Local Code T4 [reasonable time for defense counsel to prepare].
IT IS SO ORDERED. Time is excluded from today's date through and including September 30, 2011, in the interests of justice pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) [reasonable time to prepare] and Local Code T4. The court finds that the ends of justice to be served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.