UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION
September 1, 2011
RONALD BOONE, SR., SHARON MOSBY, ESTATE OF RONALD BOONE, PLAINTIFFS,
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT, WILLIAM BRATTON, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, LOS ANGELES COUNTY CORONER DEPARTMENT, ANTHONY HERNANDEZ, LAKHSHMANAN SATHYAVAGISWARAN, AND DOES 1 THROUGH 10, DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: The Honorable George H. Wu United States District Judge
[Assigned to Judge George H. Wu, Courtroom "10"]
JUDGMENT ON ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT CRAIG MILLER'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Date: August 22, 2011 Time: 8:30 a.m.
Dept.: 10 Trial Date: November 8, 2011
TO ALL PARTIES AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD HEREIN:
Defendant CRAIG MILLER'S Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint came on regularly for hearing on August 22, 2011, at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom "10" of the above-entitled Court, and the issue before the Court having been duly heard and considered, no just reason for delay of entry of judgment having been found, and a decision having been duly rendered, IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:
(1) The Court's ruling on CRAIG MILLER's Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint with prejudice shall constitute a final judgment as to CRAIG MILLER because the Second Amended Complaint failed to state a cause of action under F.R.C.P. 12(b)(6) and CRAIG MILLER is entitled to qualified immunity, whereas:
(2) Plaintiffs RONALD BOONE, SR., SHARON MOSBY, and the ESTATE OF RONALD BOONE shall take nothing against defendant CRAIG MILLER; and
(3) Defendant CRAIG MILLER shall have judgment against plaintiffs RONALD BOONE, SR., SHARON MOSBY, and the ESTATE OF RONALD BOONE pursuant to F.R.C.P. § 54(d).
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.