Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Francisco Gil v. James A. Yates

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


September 2, 2011

FRANCISCO GIL,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
JAMES A. YATES, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Dennis L. Beck United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER DISREGARDING PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (DOCS. 35, 53)

Plaintiff Francisco Gil ("Plaintiff") was formerly a California state prisoner. Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding against Defendant Amadi for deliberate indifference in violation of the Eighth Amendment and negligence. Pending before the Court are: 1) Plaintiff's motion for extension of time, filed October 4, 2010, and 2) Plaintiff's motion for extension of time, filed August 24, 2011. Docs. 35, 53.

In Plaintiff's October 4, 2010 motion, Plaintiff requests an extension of time to respond to any court orders. Plaintiff declares that he had recently been deported to Mexico. However, at the time Plaintiff filed his motion, there were no orders to which the Court required a response. Accordingly, Plaintiff's October 4, 2010 motion is DISREGARDED.

In Plaintiff's August 24, 2011 motion, Plaintiff requests an extension of time to oppose Defendant's motion for summary judgment, if any. However, no such motion has been filed. Defendant has yet to answer Plaintiff's complaint or file any responsive pleading. Accordingly, Plaintiff's August 24, 2011 motion is DISREGARDED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20110902

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.