UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
September 2, 2011
GEORGE H. ROBINSON,
D. ADAMS, ET AL.,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Sandra M. Snyder United States Magistrate Judge
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO SCHEDULE PRETRIAL AND TRIAL DATES AS PREMATURE (ECF No. 120)
On July 1, 15, and 25, 2011, Plaintiff filed motions for reconsideration by the District Judge of the order granting in part and denying in part his motion to compel. On August 31, 2011, Plaintiff filed a motion to schedule the pretrial and trial dates in this action. Since there are still discovery issues pending in this action, Plaintiff's motion shall be denied as premature. Once Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration has been decided by the District Judge, and all discovery issues are resolved, an order will issue setting dates in this action.
Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion to schedule pretrial and trial dates is HEREBY DENIED as premature.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.