UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
September 7, 2011
YOUNG HAN, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS SUCCESSOR-
IN-INTEREST TO DECEDENT JOSEPH HAN; NAM HAN; DAVID HAN,
CITY OF FOLSOM, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION; SAMUEL L. SPIEGEL, IN HIS CAPACITY AS CHIEF OF POLICE FOR THE CITY OF FOLSOM; PAUL BARBER, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS CAPACITY AS A POLICE OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF FOLSOM; DAREN PROCIW, INDIVIDUALLY AND HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS A POLICE OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF FOLSOM; RON PETERSON, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS CAPACITY AS A SERGEANT OF POLICE FOR THE CITY OF FOLSOM, AND DOES 1-25, INCLUSIVE, DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Morrison C. England, JR United States District Judge
PLAINTIFFS' REQUEST FOR PAGE LIMIT INCREASE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; ORDER THEREON
PLAINTIFFS' REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO EXCEED PAGE LIMIT IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR 1 SUMMARY JUDGMENT Case No. 2:10-CV-00633-FCD-GGH
Plaintiffs hereby request leave of the Court for an increase in the 20-page limitation on their Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Judgment, to authorize an opposition brief not to exceed 30 pages. The requested increase is necessary to address and oppose at least five different substantive legal issues defendants have raised in their 27 page brief, and to correct defendants' misrepresentations and omissions of material facts in this action.
Based on the foregoing, Plaintiffs respectfully request leave of the Court for an Order authorizing a brief in Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment not to exceed thirty
Dated: August 25, 2011
THE LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS
/s/ Benjamin Nisenbaum Benjamin Nisenbaum Attorney for Plaintiffs
PURSUANT TO PLAINTIFFS' REQUEST, Plaintiffs are hereby authorized to file a brief in Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment not to exceed thirty (30) pages.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.