Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

State of Oregon, Ex Rel. v. Au Optronics Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION)


September 9, 2011

STATE OF OREGON, EX REL.
JOHN KROGER,
PLAINTIFFS,
v.
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, ET AL.,
DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Susan Illston United States District Judge

This Document Relates to Individual Attorney General,

Master File No. 3:07-md-1827

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT

WHEREAS plaintiff State of Oregon ("Oregon") filed the above captioned lawsuit on August 10, 2010; 3

WHEREAS Oregon filed a first amended complaint on April 15, 2011 ("Amended Complaint"); 5

WHEREAS Defendants Hitachi Displays, Ltd., Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc. 6 7 and Hitachi, Ltd. (collectively, the "Hitachi Defendants") and Defendants Chi Mei Corporation, Chi Mei Innolux Corporation, CMO Japan Co., Ltd., and Chi Mei Optoelectronic USA, Inc. 9

(collectively, the "Chi Mei Defendants") jointly filed with other defendants a motion to dismiss 10

Count III in its entirety and Count IV to the extent it seeks "disgorgement of profits" as a remedy 11 on June 6, 2011; 12

WHEREAS the Court denied Defendants' joint motion to dismiss Counts III and IV of the Amended Complaint on July 12, 2011;

WHEREAS all defendants, including the Hitachi Defendants and Chi Mei Defendants, entered into a stipulation with Oregon on July 21, 2011 that Defendants' deadline to answer the 17 Amended Complaint was August 12, 2011; 18

WHEREAS on July 21, 2011, the Court entered an order extending Defendants' deadline 19 to answer the Amended Complaint until August 12, 2011; 20

WHEREAS the Hitachi Defendants and Chi Mei Defendants entered into a stipulation 21 22 with Oregon on August 11, 2011 that the Hitachi Defendants' and Chi Mei Defendants' deadline to answer the Amended Complaint is September 12, 2011; 24

WHEREAS on August 24, 2011, the Court entered an order extending the Hitachi Defendants' and Chi Mei Defendants' deadline to answer the Amended Complaint until 26 September 12, 2011; 27

WHEREAS extending the Hitachi Defendants' and Chi Mei Defendants' time to respond 2 to the Amended Complaint will not alter the date of any other event or deadline already fixed by 3 the Court; 4

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the 5 undersigned counsel, on behalf of their respective clients, Oregon, on the one hand, and the 6 7 Hitachi Defendants and Chi Mei Defendants on the other hand, as follows:

Hitachi Defendants and Chi Mei Defendants will have until September 26, 2011 to answer Oregon's Amended Complaint.

HAGLUND KELLEY HORNGREN JONES & WILDER LLP

/s/ Michael K. Kelley Michael E. Haglund (SBN 772030) Michael K. Kelley (SBN 853782) Shay S. Scott (SBN 934214) HAGLUND KELLEY HORNGREN JONES & WILDER LLP 200 SW Market Street, Suite 1777 Portland, OR 97201 Tel: (503) 225-0777 Fax: (503) 225-1257 mhaglund@hk-law.com Counsel for State of Oregon OREGON SENIOR ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL Tim D. Nord (SBN 882800) 1162 Court Street, NW Salem, OR 97301-4096

Tel: (503) 947-4333

Fax: (503) 225-1257 tim.d.nord@state.or.us

Counsel for State of Oregon

MORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

/s/ Kent M. Roger

Kent M. Roger (SBN 95987) Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP One Market, Spear Street Tower San Francisco, CA 94105 Tel: (415) 442-1000 Fax: (415) 442-1001 kroger@morganlewis.com

Attorneys for Defendants Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi Displays, Ltd., and Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc.

DAVIS POLK & WARDWELL LLP /s/ Sandra West Christopher B. Hockett (SBN 121539)

Neal A. Potischman (SBN 254862) Sandra West (SBN 250389)

Samantha H. Knox (SBN 254427) Micah G. Block (SBN 270712) DAVIS POLK & WARDWELL LLP 1600 El Camino Real Menlo Park, CA 94025 Tel: (650) 752-2000 Fax: (650) 752-2111 chris.hockett@davispolk.com neal.potischman@davispolk.com sandra.west@davispolk.com samantha.knox@davispolk.com micah.block@davispolk.com Jonathan D. Martin (admitted pro hac vice) Bradley R. Hansen (admitted pro hac vice) DAVIS POLK & WARDWELL LLP 450 Lexington Avenue

New York, NY 10017 Tel: (212) 450-4000

Fax: (212) 701-5800

jonathan.martin@davispolk.com bradley.hansen@davispolk.com

Attorneys for Defendants Chimei Innolux Corporation

(F/K/A Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corp.), Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc., and CMO Japan Co., Ltd.

FILER'S ATTESTATION

I, Kent M. Roger, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file 3 this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B, I hereby 4 attest that Michael M. Kelley and Sandra West concur in this filing. 5

/s/ Kent M. Roger Kent M. Roger Attorneys for Defendants Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi Displays, Ltd., and Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the parties' stipulation set forth above and pursuant to Rule 6-1(a) of the Civil Local Rules, IT IS SO ORDERED. 4

Dated: September ___, 2011

By

20110909

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.