Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

In Re Tft-Lcd (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION


September 9, 2011

IN RE TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Susan Illston United States District Judge

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EX 21 PARTE APPLICATION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

This Document Relates To: Target Corporation, et al. v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al.,

Case No. CV:10-4945 SI

[Civil Local Rule 79-5]

Having considered the application regarding whether certain documents Plaintiffs Target Corporation; Sears, Roebuck and Co.; Kmart Corporation; Old Comp Inc.; Good Guys, Inc.; 3 RadioShack Corporation; and Newegg Inc. ("Plaintiffs") lodged with the Court should be filed 4 under seal pursuant to Civil Local Rules 79-5(d) and 7-10 and the Court's Standing Order, and 5 good cause appearing, the application is hereby GRANTED.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

x Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint has been redacted and publicly filed. The redacted portions of the Second Amended Complaint shall remain under seal.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, to maintain the effect of the seal under Civil Local

Rule 79-5, the parties, their counsel, and their declarants shall not publicly disseminate or discuss 11 any of the sealed documents or their contents absent further order of the Court. 12 13

20110909

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.