UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
September 9, 2011
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
DIONISIO ROBLES PADILLA,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Hon. William B. Shubb
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE TO SEPTEMBER 26, 2011, AT 8:30 A.M. Date: September 12, 2011 Time: 8:30 a.m.
THE PARTIES STIPULATE, through counsel, Jill M. Thomas, Assistant United States Attorney, and Michael Petrik, Jr., attorney for Mr. Padilla, that the Court vacate the status conference scheduled for September 12, 2011, at 8:30 a.m., and reset it for September 26, 2011, at 8:30 a.m.
Defense counsel requires the continuance to review discovery and confer with Mr. Padilla.
The parties further stipulate that the Court should exclude the period from the date of this order through September 26, 2011, when it computes the time within which the trial of the above criminal prosecution must commence for purposes of the Speedy Trial Act. The parties stipulate that the ends of justice served by granting Mr. Padilla's request for a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and Mr. Padilla in a speedy trial, and that this is an appropriate exclusion of time for defense preparation within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7) (Local Code T4).
Dated: September 9, 2011 Respectfully submitted, DANIEL BRODERICK Federal Defender /s/ M.Petrik MICHAEL PETRIK, Jr. Assistant Federal Defender Attorneys for Defendant Dated: September 9, 2011 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney /s/ M.Petrik for Jill M. Thomas JILL M. THOMAS Assistant U.S. Attorney
ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED. The Court orders time excluded from the date of this order through the status conference on September 26, 2011, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7) (Local Code T4). The Court also finds that the ends of justice served by granting Mr. Padilla's request for a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and Mr. Padilla in a speedy trial.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.