Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Artay Scruggs v. S. Vance

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


September 12, 2011

ARTAY SCRUGGS, PLAINTIFF,
v.
S. VANCE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Kendall J. Newman United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

On August 30, 2011, counsel for defendants objected to and sought clarification of this court's August 24, 2011 protective order, requesting that counsel for defendants also be allowed to review the documents subpoenaed by plaintiff. The court contemplated the protective order as applicable to those documents received by counsel for plaintiff via subpoena duces tecum and did not intend to preclude defendants' counsel from reviewing the documents accessible to defendants' counsel through the Department of Corrections. Good cause appearing, the August 24, 2011 protective order is amended to read as follows:

The production of documents pertinent to inmate Robinson is subject to a protective order. Any documents produced as to inmate Robinson shall be used solely for the purpose of this litigation, and the documents shall be reviewed solely by counsel for the parties.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The August 24, 2011 protective order (dkt. no. 140) is revised; and

2. Any documents produced as to inmate Robinson are subject to a protective order; Robinson's documents shall be used solely for the purpose of this litigation, and shall be reviewed solely by counsel for the parties.

scru0633.rev

20110912

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.