Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Matthew Lucas v. Redding Police Dept.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


September 12, 2011

MATTHEW LUCAS FRAZIER, PLAINTIFF,
v.
REDDING POLICE DEPT., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gregory G. Hollows United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By order filed on July 6, 2011, plaintiff's original complaint was dismissed with leave to amend within twenty-eight days. Plaintiff filed an amended complaint on August 1, 2011; however, subsequently, plaintiff sought leave to file a further amended complaint. Plaintiff is concerned that a portion of his first amended complaint is inaccurate based on having recently received a copy of his case records/file. Although plaintiff should have attached a proposed second amended complaint with his motion, the court will grant plaintiff further leave to amend within twenty-eight days. Should plaintiff fail to amend timely, the court will proceed to screen the first amended complaint.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's September 2, 2011 (docket # 11), motion to amend the amended complaint is granted and plaintiff is hereby permitted twenty-eight days from the date of this order to file a second amended complaint; should he fail to do so, the court will proceed to screen the first amended complaint.

GGH:009 fraz1351.ord

20110912

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.