Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Anthony M. Blackwell v. Roderick Q. Hickman

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


September 14, 2011

ANTHONY M. BLACKWELL, PETITIONER,
v.
RODERICK Q. HICKMAN, RESPONDENT.
ANTHONY M. BLACKWELL, PETITIONER,
v.
JAMES WALKER, RESPONDENT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gregory G. Hollows United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Petitioner in both cases, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The above two cases have been consolidated. On August 12, 2011, in case 06-1876 petitioner filed a motion (Doc. 25) noting that respondent had not filed an answer on time. Petitioner is mistaken, respondent requested an extension which appeared in case 10-2316 which was granted and respondent filed the answer on August 9, 2011. Therefore, respondent's answer is timely filed.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The motion for default judgment (Doc. 25 in CIV S-06-1876 RRB GGH) is denied and respondent's answer is timely filed.

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to docket respondent's answer, Doc. 23 in CIV S-06-1876 RRB GGH onto the docket in CIV S-10-2316 RRB GGH P

20110914

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.