IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
September 15, 2011
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lawrence J. O'Neill United States District Judge
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 28)
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On August 25, 2011, the assigned Magistrate Judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that Plaintiff's motion for law library access be denied. (Doc. 28.) The assigned Magistrate Judge explained that T. Peterson, the individual allegedly denying Plaintiff law library access, is not before the Court in this case and therefore the Court has no power to issue injunctive relief from that individual. (Id. at 3.)
The findings and recommendations contained notice that any objections were to be filed within fourteen days of service. As of the date of this order, Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.*fn1
The Court has conducted a de novo review of this case in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the findings and recommendations are supported by the record and the proper analysis.
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's January 3, 2011 motion for law library access (Doc. 21) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.