Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Dennly R. Becker; the Becker Trust v. Wells Fargo Bank

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


September 15, 2011

DENNLY R. BECKER; THE BECKER TRUST
PLAINTIFFS,
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., INC., ET AL. DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Kendall J. Newman United States Magistrate Judge

DATED MARCH 25, 1991,

ORDER

Plaintiffs Dennly Becker ("Becker") and the Becker Trust Dated March 25, 1991 ("Becker Trust") (collectively, the "plaintiff"*fn1 ) is proceeding without counsel in this action.*fn2 A review of the court's docket reflects that on August 30, 2011, plaintiff filed a "Motion to Amend Complaint." (Dkt. No. 62). As stated in the Judge Karlton's minute order of September 1, 2011, however, plaintiff defectively noticed that motion. (Dkt. No. 64.) Judge Karlton's minute order of September 1, 2011, also advised plaintiff to "properly re-notice the motion to be heard before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman." (Dkt. No. 64.)

To date, however, plaintiff has not re-noticed his motion before Judge Newman. Accordingly, plaintiff's "Motion to Amend Complaint" (Dkt. No. 62) is hereby denied without prejudice to refiling. Should plaintiff choose to re-file his motion, such filing should be in accordance with Local Rule 230(b) and (k).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.