Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Michael Mccune v. Satnam Singh

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


September 16, 2011

MICHAEL MCCUNE, PLAINTIFF,
v.
SATNAM SINGH, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gregory G. Hollows United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

This action was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On June 13, 2011, the scheduling order directed defendant to file an answer to the amended complaint within 28 days of the order. Defendant has not filed an answer to the amended complaint.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

Defendant shall show cause, in writing, within fourteen (14) days from the date of this order, why an answer has not been filed, or he shall file an answer. Failure to comply with this order will result in sanctions, including the possibility of default.

20110916

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.