(Super. Ct. No. JV124883)
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Blease , J.
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
The Fresno County Juvenile Court found that minor J.M., age 16, was described by Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 in that he committed grand theft from a person. (Pen. Code, § 487, subd. (c).) Because the minor was a resident of Sacramento County, the matter was transferred there for disposition. Following preparation of a social study report, the Sacramento County Juvenile Court continued the minor as a ward of the court, continued his placement in a group home, and reinstated his wardship status on terms and conditions including a period of community service.
The minor contends, and the Attorney General concedes, the matter must be remanded to the Sacramento court to determine in its discretion whether the grand theft is a felony or a misdemeanor. We shall remand for further proceedings.
The facts of the minor's offense are not at issue and may be briefly stated. In November 2009, the 14-year-old victim was a student at a Fresno high school. As the victim walked toward a restroom, the minor approached him from behind, spoke some words, passed him, and then turned to address him. The minor asked the victim if he had money, and the victim said no. The minor then asked the victim whether he had a telephone. The victim answered in the affirmative but explained that it was broken. Upon further questioning, the victim explained that the broken telephone was in his pocket. The minor attempted to touch the telephone in the pocket but the victim moved away. The minor next asked the victim if he could see the telephone. In response, the victim removed the telephone from the pocket. At that point, the minor "snatched" the telephone from the victim's hand and walked away.
The minor contends, and the Attorney General concedes, the matter must be remanded to the Sacramento County Juvenile Court with directions to determine in its discretion whether the grand theft offense is a felony or a misdemeanor. We accept the Attorney General's concession.
The minor's offense, grand theft from a person, is an alternate felony misdemeanor, commonly called a "wobbler." (Pen. Code, §§ 487, subd. (c), 489, subd. (b).) Welfare and Institutions Code*fn1 section 702 states in relevant part: "If the minor is found to have committed an offense which would in the case of an adult be punishable alternatively as a felony or a misdemeanor, the court shall declare the offense to be a misdemeanor or felony." "The requirement is obligatory: ' . . . section 702 means what it says and mandates the juvenile court to declare the offense a felony or misdemeanor.' [Citations.]" (In re Manzy W. (1997) 14 Cal.4th 1199, 1204.) "[N]either the pleading, the minute order, nor the setting of a felony-level period of physical confinement may substitute for a declaration by the juvenile court as to whether an offense is a misdemeanor or felony. [Citation.]" (Id. at p. 1208.) Because the Fresno County Juvenile Court had not made the determination during its jurisdictional proceedings, ...