UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
September 21, 2011
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
KING CHUEN TANG A/K/A CHEN TANG, RONALD YEE, ZISEN YU, JOSEPH SETO,
MING SIU, KING S. TANG A/K/A JAMES K. TANG, AND YING KIT YU A/K/A EDDIE YU,
VENTURE ASSOCIATES FUND I, TANG
CAPITAL PARTNERS, ACCELERATION CAPITAL PARTNERS, AMERICAN
PEGASUS LONG SHORT FUND SEGREGATED PORTFOLIO, PING LEE
TANG, KA LING LEE, YIN LEE KA, CHEUNG-TING KA, SYLVIA TSUI, DOI PING SIU, YUEN-LAI MA, LEUNG-KEE SIU, ROSALIE CHO, AND MINOR CHILD I AND MINOR CHILD II, MINOR CHILDREN OF DEFENDANT KING CHUEN TANG A/K/A CHEN TANG,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Hon. Joseph C. Spero
KEKER & VAN NEST LLP MICHAEL D. CELIO - #197998 2 email@example.com QUYEN L. TA - #229956 3 firstname.lastname@example.org 633 Battery Street 4 San Francisco, CA 94111-1809 Telephone: (415) 391-5400 5 Facsimile: (415) 397-7188 6 Attorneys for Defendant RONALD YEE 7
Date Comp. Filed: October 11, 2009
Trial Date: February 13, 2012
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS
WHEREAS, on May 17, 2011, the Court issued a Further Case Management and Pretrial Order setting November 4, 2011 as the hearing date for motions for dispositive motions and 3 further ordered that reply briefs be submitted no less than four weeks prior to the hearing date
WHEREAS, on August 29, 2011 the Court issued an order (at the parties'
extending the discovery cutoff date until September 30, 2011 (Dkt.
prior to the close of fact discovery in the case;
parties to continue the hearing date for dispositive motions until
December 2, 2011 (or such other 11 date in December that is convenient
for the Court);
(Dkt. No. 161);
WHEREAS, the present schedule would therefore require dispositive motions to be filed
WHEREAS, the parties respectfully submit that it is therefore in the interest of the
WHEREAS, the parties respectfully request that all dispositive motions are to be filed by October 7, 2011; oppositions to such motions are to be filed by October 21, 2011; and replies are 14 to be filed by November 7, 2011;
effect on any other deadlines set by this Court;
undersigned counsel for the Parties, that:
the parties shall file dispositive motions on the dates set forth above.
WHEREAS, extending the hearing date for dispositive motions would not have any
IT IS STIPULATED, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(b), 6-2(a) and 7-12, by and between the
1. The hearing date for dispositive motions shall be extended to December 2, 2011, and
2. All other dates set pursuant to the Court's Further Case Management and Pretrial Order of May 17, 2011 shall remain in place.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Joseph C. Spero Judge
United States District Court Magistrate Judge
I, Michael D. Celio am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that all signatories have concurred in this filing.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.