Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Robert Lee Stringfellow v. John Mcginness

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


September 21, 2011

ROBERT LEE STRINGFELLOW, PLAINTIFF,
v.
JOHN MCGINNESS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gregory G. Hollows United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Plaintiff is a prisoner who is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 10, 2011, the undersigned issued a discovery and scheduling order with respect to several defendants that had answered the complaint. On September 19, 2011, defendant Total Renal Care, incorrectly identified as Davita Dialysis, answered the complaint

Therefore the August 10, 2011 order, shall be applied to Total Renal Care, except that: The parties may conduct discovery until January 16, 2012. Any motions necessary to compel discovery shall be filed by that date. All requests for discovery pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 31, 33, 34 or 36 shall be served not later than sixty days prior to that date.

All pretrial motions, except motions to compel discovery, shall be filed on or before April 13, 2012. Motions shall be briefed in accordance with paragraph 7 of this court's order filed May 3, 2011.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20110921

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.