Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Alvaro Rodriguez, Manuel Padilla v. Harvey Boschma; Terry Lynn Boschma; Henry Boschma

September 22, 2011

ALVARO RODRIGUEZ, MANUEL PADILLA,
AND CARMELO ACEVES GARCIA, ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ALL OTHER
SIMILARLY SITUATED INDIVIDUALS, PLAINTIFFS
v.
HARVEY BOSCHMA; TERRY LYNN BOSCHMA; HENRY BOSCHMA MARITAL TRUST (SOLE BENEFICIARY GRETA BOSCHMA) (DBA "BOSCHMA & SONS DAIRY," "WASCO DAIRY," AND "HENRY BOSCHMA DAIRY")
DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lawrence J. O'Neill United States District Judge

ORDER: (1) CONDITIONALLY CERTIFYING SETTLEMENT CLASS; (2) PRELIMINARILY APPROVING CLASS SETTLEMENT; (3) APPOINTING CLASS REPRESENTATIVES AND CLASS COUNSEL; (4) APPROVING CLASS NOTICE AND RELATED MATERIALS; (5) APPOINTING SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATOR; AND (6) SCHEDULING FINAL APPROVAL HEARING

This court has taken the motion of plaintiffs Alvaro Rodriguez, Manuel Padilla, and Carmelo Aceves Garcia ("Plaintiffs"), for preliminary certification of a settlement class in this action, preliminary approval of the parties' proposed settlement, approval of the notice to be sent to the class about the settlement and the forms of class member settlement information and election not to participate in the settlement, approval of the claim form and consent to jurisdiction, and the setting of a date for the hearing on final approval of the settlement under submission. Defendants have filed a notice of non-opposition to this motion.

The Court having read and considered the papers on the motion, the law, and good cause appearing therefore,

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Court has jurisdiction over this action and the parties' proposed settlement under 28 U.S.C. sections 1331 and 1367, as plaintiffs' original complaint was brought under federal and California wage-and-hour law; the Court has original jurisdiction over plaintiffs' federal law claims; and the Court has supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiffs' state-law claims because they arise from the same alleged transactions and occurrences as do plaintiffs' federal-law claims.

2. The proposed class satisfies the requirements of a settlement class because the class members are readily ascertainable and a well-defined community of interest exists in the questions of law and fact affecting the parties.

3. The parties' Settlement Agreement (the "Settlement") (Declaration of Stan S. Mallison in Support of Joint Motion for Order: (1) Conditionally Certifying Settlement Class; (2) Preliminarily Approving Class Settlement; (3) Appointing Class Representatives and Class Counsel; (4) Approving Class Notice and Related Materials; (5) Appointing Simpluris Inc as Settlement Administrator; and (6) Scheduling Final Approval Hearing ["Mallison Decl."], Exh. 1) is granted preliminary approval as it meets the criteria for preliminary settlement approval. The Settlement falls within the range of possible approval as fair, adequate and reasonable, and appears to be the product of arm's-length and informed negotiations and to treat all Class Members fairly.

4. The parties' proposed notice plan is constitutionally sound because individual notices will be mailed to all class members whose identities are known to the parties, and such notice is the best notice practicable. The parties' proposed Notice of Proposed Settlement of Class Action, Conditional Certification of Settlement Class, Preliminary Approval of Settlement, and Hearing Date for Final Court Approval ("Class Notice") (Settlement Agreement, Exh. 2), and proposed forms of Claim Form and Election Not to Participate in Settlement (id., Exhs. 3 and 4)) (collectively the "Class Notice Packet") are sufficient to inform Class Members of the terms of the Settlement, their rights under the Settlement, their rights to object to the settlement, their right to receive a Settlement Share or elect not to participate in the Settlement, and the processes for doing so, and the date and location of the final approval hearing, and therefore are all approved.

5. The following class of persons are certified as the Class in this action solely for the purposes of the Settlement:

All persons who are or have been employed at "Boschma & Sons Dairy," "Wasco Dairy," or Henry Boschma Dairy" as regular non-exempt agricultural Dairy workers from November 17, 2005 until April 14, 2011 inclusive.

6. Any Class Member who submits a timely and valid Claim Form within thirty days after the date the Settlement Administrator mails the Class Notice Packet will receive a Settlement Share.

7. Any Class Member who wishes to comment on or object to the Settlement or who elects not to participate in the Settlement has until thirty days after the mailing of the Class Notice Packet to submit his or her comment, objection, or Election Not to Participate in Settlement pursuant to the procedures set forth in the Class Notice.

8. Simpluris Inc., is appointed to act as the Settlement Administrator, pursuant to the terms set forth in the Settlement.

9. Plaintiffs Alvaro Rodriguez, Manuel Padilla, and Carmelo Aceves Garcia are appointed Class Representatives. Stan S. Mallison and Hector R. Martinez and the Law Offices of ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.