Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Vance Edward Johnson v. Lt. R. Janzen

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


September 22, 2011

VANCE EDWARD JOHNSON, PLAINTIFF,
v.
LT. R. JANZEN, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Kendall J. Newman United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

On September 9, 2011, plaintiff filed a motion to compel discovery responses to discovery propounded on August 2, 2011. Plaintiff relies on Rules 33(b) and 34(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which require a thirty day response. However, in the court's discovery and scheduling order, issued July 8, 2011, defendants were granted 45 days in which to respond to written discovery requests. (Dkt. No. 19 at 5.) Therefore, plaintiff's motion to compel is premature and is denied.

On September 21, 2011, defendant filed a request for extension of time to respond to plaintiff's discovery requests. Counsel for defendant has been unable to obtain defendant's responses as defendant has been off work for the last three weeks. The request for extension of time is granted; however, counsel for defendant is cautioned that he should make other arrangements to contact defendant to avoid further delays in this action.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's September 9, 2011 motion to compel (dkt. no. 24) is denied without prejudice;

2. Defendant's September 21, 2011 motion for extension of time (dkt. no. 26) is granted; and

3. Defendant is granted 28 days from the date of this order in which to respond to plaintiff's discovery requests.

20110922

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.