UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
September 23, 2011
MICHAEL CRUDUP, PLAINTIFF,
J. WARD, ET AL.,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Dennis L. Beck United States Magistrate Judge
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO
RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO
RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE
Plaintiff Michael Crudup ("Plaintiff") is a prisoner in the custody of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation ("CDCR"). Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding against Defendants J. Ward and M. Jericoff. Pending before the Court is Defendants' motion to dismiss, filed July 19, 2011. Doc. 18. As of the date of this order, Plaintiff has not filed an opposition or statement of non-opposition, as required by Local Rule 230(l).
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff is to file an opposition to Defendants' motion to dismiss within twenty-one (21) days from the date of service of this order. Failure to timely file an opposition will be construed as waiver of the opportunity to file opposition, and may result in dismissal of this action for failure to obey a court order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.