Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States of America v. Jorge Guillen and Jose Bravo

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


September 23, 2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
JORGE GUILLEN AND JOSE BRAVO,
DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Hon. William B. Shubb

DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar# 89424 Federal Defender BENJAMIN D. GALLOWAY, Bar# 214897 Assistant Federal Defender 801 I Street, 3rd Floor Sacramento, California 95814 Telephone (916) 498-5700 Attorney for Defendant JORGE GUILLEN

DATE: October 31, 2011

TIME: 9:30 a.m.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER

It is hereby stipulated and agreed to between the United States of America through JASON HITT, Assistant U.S. Attorney, and defendant, JORGE GUILLEN by and through his counsel, BENJAMIN GALLOWAY, Assistant Federal Defender, and JOSE BRAVO, by and through his attorney, CLEMENTE JIMENEZ, that the status conference set for Monday, September 26, 2011, be continued to Monday, October 31, 2011, at 9:30 a.m..

The reason for this continuance is to allow defense counsel additional time to review discovery with the defendants, to examine possible defenses and to continue investigating the facts of the case. Speedy trial time is to be excluded from the date of this order through the date of the status conference set for October 31, 2011, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161 (h)(8)(B)(iv) [reasonable time to prepare] (Local Code T4).

ORDER

IT HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is continued to October 31, 2011, at 9:30 a.m., for Further Status Conference.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161 (h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T4, the period from the date of this order September 26, 2011 up to and including October 31, 2011, is excluded from the time computations required by the Speedy Trial Act due to ongoing preparation of counsel, and that the ends of justice served by this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.

20110923

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.