IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
September 26, 2011
RONALD ROSE, PLAINTIFF,
AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE SERVICING, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gregory G. Hollows United States Magistrate Judge
FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS
By order filed July 25, 2011, plaintiff was ordered to show cause, within fourteen days, why defendant Option One Mortgage should not be dismissed for failure to serve this defendant in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). Plaintiff has responded to the court's order, explaining his understanding that Option One Mortgage is no longer in business.
IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that defendant Option One Mortgage be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.