IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
September 26, 2011
DANIEL THOMAS HARVEY, PLAINTIFF,
CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE; EL DORADO COUNTY; ANDREW EISSINGER; CHARLES DUKE, DEFENDANTS.
On August 9, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff filed objections on August 22, 2011.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis.*fn1
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:
1. The Findings and Recommendations filed August 9, 2011, are ADOPTED.
2. Defendant El Dorado County's motion to dismiss, ECF No. 16, is granted as follows:
a. Claims purportedly against El Dorado Superior Court, as discussed in the findings and recommendations, are dismissed without leave to amend; and
b. All other claims against defendant El Dorado County are dismissed with leave to amend as discussed in the findings and recommendations.
3. The City defendants' motion to dismiss, ECF No. 17, is granted as follows:
a. Claims for violation of California Penal Code sections 182, 484, and 849(b)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 1503 are dismissed without leave to amend; and
b. All other claims against the City defendants are dismissed with leave to amend as discussed in the findings and recommendations.
4. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order to file a second amended complaint.