The opinion of the court was delivered by: Terry J. Hatter, Jr., U. S. District Judge
Social Security No. 6 3 9 2 (Last 4 digits)
JUDGMENT AND PROBATION/COMMITMENT ORDER
In the presence of the attorney for the government, the defendant appeared in person on this date. SEPT. 26 2011
X WITH COUNSEL Matthew Lombard, appointed
X GUILTY, and the court being satisfied that there is a factual basis for the plea.
NOLO CONTENDERE NOT GUILTY
There being a finding/verdict of X GUILTY, defendant has been convicted as charged of the offense(s) of: Wire and Bank Fraud Conspiracy in violation of Title 18 United States Code, Section 1349, as charged in Count 1 of the 51 Count Indictment.
The Court asked whether there was any reason why judgment should not be pronounced. Because no sufficient cause to the contrary was shown, or appeared to the Court, the Court adjudged the defendant guilty as charged and convicted and ordered that: Pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, it is the judgment of the Court that the defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a term of: TIME SERVED.
The Court ORDERS the defendant to pay to the United States a special assessment of $100.00, to the Clerk of the Court, which is
It is ordered that the defendant shall pay restitution in the total amount of $1,797 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3663A. The amount of restitution ordered shall be paid as follows:
Amount $1,797 Restitution shall be paid in full immediately.
The defendant shall comply with General Order No. 01-05.
Pursuant to Guideline Section 5E1.2(a), all fines are waived as the Court finds that the defendant has established that he is unable to pay and is not likely to become able to pay any fine.
Pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, it is the judgment of the Court that the defendant, Alan Elvis St. Pierre, is hereby, committed on Count 1 of the Indictment to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a term of TIME SERVED. Upon release from imprisonment, the defendant shall be placed on supervised release for a term of three years under the following. The defendant shall comply with the rules and regulations of the U. S. Probation Office and General Order 05-02.
. The defendant shall refrain from any unlawful use of a controlled substance. The defendant shall submit to one drug test within 15 days of release from imprisonment and at least two periodic drug tests thereafter, not to exceed eight tests per month, as directed by the Probation Officer. . The defendant shall participate for a period of five months in a home detention program which may include electronic monitoring, GPS, Alcohol Monitoring Unit or automated identification systems and shall observe all rules of such program, as directed by the Probation Officer. The defendant shall maintain a residential telephone line without devices and/or services that may interrupt operation of the monitoring equipment. If no positives U. S. Probation Officer may request to strike electronic . The defendant shall pay the costs of Location Monitoring to the contract vendor, not to exceed the sum of $12.00 for each day of participation. The defendant shall provide payment and proof of payment as directed by the Probation Officer.
During the period of community supervision the defendant shall pay the special assessment and restitution in accordance with this judgment's orders pertaining to such payment.
When not employed or excused by the Probation Officer for schooling, training, or other acceptable reasons, the defendant shall perform 20 hours of community service per week as directed by the Probation Officer. . The defendant shall cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample from the defendant.
The Court informs the defendant of his right to appeal.
On Government's motion, remaining counts 32 and 33 of the Indictment are hereby ordered dismissed.
In addition to the special conditions of supervision imposed above, it is hereby ordered that the Standard Conditions of Probation and Supervised Release within this judgment be imposed. The Court may change the conditions of supervision, reduce or extend the period of supervision, and at any time during the supervision period or within the maximum period permitted by law, ...