Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Rick Lee Hazen v. the Home Depot

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


September 28, 2011

RICK LEE HAZEN, PLAINTIFF,
v.
THE HOME DEPOT, INC., DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gregory G. Hollows United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Presently pending on this court's law and motion calendar for November 11, 2011, is plaintiff's motion for relief from the scheduling order. After reviewing the papers in support of and in opposition to the motion, the court has determined that the matter is suitable for decision without oral argument, and now issues the following order.

Plaintiff's counsel seeks an extension of time in which to conduct discovery because he was unable to complete depositions from February, 2011 until mid to late September, 2011, during which time he was diagnosed with tonsil cancer, and underwent three surgeries, as well as intensive chemotherapy and radiation treatments. The declaration of counsel Altemus states that his physicians advised him he will be unable to work full time until at least mid-September. Counsel states that he needs to take three depositions of Home Depot employees.

Defendant opposes the motion, arguing that plaintiff's counsel did not take any depositions during the five month period prior to being diagnosed with cancer.

However, Mr. Altemus' declaration also states that he is a sole practitioner and that his only law partner passed away in May, 2010. (Dkt. no. 25, ¶ 5.) Moreover, plaintiff's counsel's cancer most probably exhibited itself symptomatically well before its diagnosis. Finally, it is more than probable that plaintiff's counsel, upon getting back to work full time, has been smothered in work from many cases, not just this one. Plaintiff's counsel has demonstrated good cause for an extension.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The hearing scheduled for November 10, 2011, is vacated.

2. Plaintiff's motion for relief from scheduling order, filed August 22, 2011, (dkt. no. 23), is granted. The discovery cutoff is extended from August 23, 2011 to October 20, 2011.*fn1

No other dates set forth in the previous scheduling order are affected.*fn2


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.