UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
September 29, 2011
IN RE TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Susan Illston United States District Judge
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PAGE LIMITS
FOR TOSHIBA ENTITIES' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
This Document Relates to: All Direct- and Indirect-Purchaser Class Actions
WHEREAS, the Toshiba Entities filed a motion for summary judgment on September 8, 2011 (redacted version at Dkt. # 3581), which is set for hearing on November 4, 2011;
WHEREAS, the Parties desire to alter the page limits ordinarily provided by the Local Rules to file response and reply papers in connection with the motion;
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the undersigned counsel on behalf of the Parties identified below, that:
(1) Direct-Purchaser Plaintiffs shall file an opposition to the motion not to exceed 40 pages; and exceed 40 pages.
pages, and the parties further agree that the Toshiba Entities shall have the right to seek 5 additional pages after reviewing the oppositions.
(2) Indirect-Purchaser Plaintiffs shall file an opposition to the motion not to
(3) The Toshiba Entities shall be entitled to file a single reply of at least 35
Attestation: The filer of this document attests that concurrence in the filing of this 17 document has been obtained from each of the other signatories.
Judith A. Zahid By: Judith A. Zahid
[PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to the parties' stipulation set forth above,
IT IS SO ORDERED.
By: Hon. Susan Illston United States District Judge
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.