Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Jeffrey Johnson

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


September 30, 2011

JEFFREY JOHNSON, JENNIFER RIESE, SHAUN SIMMONS, AND JAMES PURVIS, INDIVIDUALLY, AND ON BEHALF OF OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY AND DOES 1-25 INCLUSIVE,
DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: N Charles R. Breyer R Judge United States District Judge

STIPULATION REGARDING ENLARGEMENT OF TIME FOR FILING (1) PLAINTIFFS' RESPONSE INCLUDING OBJECTIONS TO BILL OF COSTS, AND (2) DEFENDANT"S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES th Dept.: Courtroom 8, 19 Floor Judge: Hon. Charles R. Breyer

1. On August 22, 2011, Defendant filed an Ex Parte Application to Extend Time for Filing 2 of Defendant's Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Bill of Costs, seeking a fourteen-day enlargement 3 of time to file its Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Bill of Costs. Plaintiffs did not oppose this 4

2. On September 1, 2011, Defendant filed its Bill of Costs but moved for a second 6 enlargement of time, until September 30, 2011, to file its Motion for Attorneys' Fees. This second 7 request, for an enlargement of time for Defendant's Motion for Attorneys' Fees, was also not 8 opposed by Plaintiffs, and it was granted on September 9, 2011, allowing Defendant to and 9 including September 30, 2011, to file any motion for attorneys' fees. 10

3. On September 9, 2011, Plaintiffs requested an enlargement of time to respond, 11 including file objections to Defendant's Bill of Costs, which was granted. Plaintiffs' response to 12

4. On September 27, 2011, Plaintiffs filed their Motion to Defer Consideration of Motions 14 for Attorneys Fees and Costs Until After Appeal is Completed. 15

Assessment Conference for October 27, 2011 to discuss whether the case is appropriate for the 17 participation in the Mediation Program. If there is movement towards or settlement of the dispute 18 at that conference, also within the enlargement of time requested here, then considerable time and 19 resources would be conserved. 20

6. Defendant's Motion for Attorneys' Fees is currently due September 30, 2011. 21

7. WHEREFORE, both sides stipulate to an extension so that both Plaintiffs' response 22 including objections to Defendant's Bill of Costs and Defendant's Motion for Attorneys' Fees are 23 now due October 31, 2011. 24 25 26 27

Application and it was granted by the Court. 5

Defendant's Bill of Costs is currently due on September 30, 2011. 13

5. Further, the Mediation Program of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has set an

Dated: September 30, 2011. FRANKLIN D. AZAR & ASSOCIATES, P.C. /s/ Franklin D. Azar Franklin D. Azar Counsel for Plaintiffs MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP /s/ Melinda S. Riechert Melinda S. Riechert Counsel for Defendant C

I N IS ORDERED

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED

20110930

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.