The opinion of the court was delivered by: Oliver W. Wanger United States District Judge
ORDER AMENDING SCHEDULING
The motion by Defendant Westlands Water District ("Westlands") for an order clarifying or in the alternative amending the Court's December 23, 2009, Order Following Scheduling Conference ("Scheduling Order"), Doc. 758, came on for hearing on June 30, 2011. Defendant Westlands was represented by Kronick, Moskovitz, Tiedemann & Girard by Daniel J. O'Hanlon, Esq. Plaintiffs were represented by Minasian, Meith, Soares, Sexton & Cooper, LLP and Paul R.Minasian and Andrew J. McClure; Federal Defendants were represented by Stephen M. Macfarlane, Esq., Trial Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice; Environmental Intervenors were represented by Altshuler Berzon LLP and Hamilton Candee, Esq. After considering the papers filed in support of and in opposition to Westlands' motion, the arguments of counsel, and all other matters presented to the Court, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Westlands' motion to amend the Scheduling Order is GRANTED, on the following terms:
1. Notwithstanding any pertinent and contrary time estimates or deadlines in the Control Schedule referenced in the Scheduling Order, Federal Defendants shall be allowed 120 days from the date of entry of this Order to analyze and evaluate the feasibility, design, cost and source of funding for commencing the construction of drainage collection, reuse, treatment and disposal systems in the central subunit of Westlands, instead of in the north subunit of Westlands as described in the Control Schedule. Upon completion of this analysis, Federal Defendants shall promptly report their conclusions to the Court and the other parties, and if applicable, submit a revised Control Schedule to the Court.
2. The Scheduling Order is further amended as follows: in addition to providing regular status reports every October 1 and April 1, the Federal Defendants shall file a supplemental status report within thirty days following Reclamation's determination that a change in circumstance or implementation has occurred that will prevent Reclamation from completing an action or actions as identified in a line item or line items on the Control Schedule; provided that nothing in this amendment otherwise precludes Reclamation from updating or modifying its Control Schedule as appropriate.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw ...