IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
October 4, 2011
INNOVATIVE AUTOMATION, LLC, PLAINTIFFS,
PRIMERA TECHNOLOGY, INC,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Howard R. Lloyd United States Magistrate Judge
NOT FOR CITATION
ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO FILE ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION UNDER CIVIL L.R. 3-12(b)
Excluding Innovative Automation LLC v. Microtech Systems, 4:11-cv-01299, which, according to plaintiff's counsel, is settling, there are four other pending cases in this district which may be related to the present one. They are: Innovative Automation LLC v. Mediatechnics Systems, Inc., 5:11-cv-03410 HRLInnovative Automation LLC v. DisCopyLabs, 3:11-cv-03411 CRB Innovative Automation LLC v. Acutrack Inc., 5:11-cv-3412 LHK Rimage Corp. v. Innovative Automation LLC, 4:11-cv-04224 DMR Accordingly, under the authority of Civil L.R. 3-12(c), the parties in the present case are ordered to 24 file forthwith an Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should be Related (Civil. L.R. 25 3-12(b)).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
C11-3713 Notice will be electronically mailed to: Adam Gutride email@example.com Seth Adam Safier firstname.lastname@example.org Todd Michael Kennedy email@example.com Victoria L.H. Booke firstname.lastname@example.org Martin R. Glick email@example.com Edward Andrew Bayley firstname.lastname@example.org Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.