UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
October 4, 2011
IN RE: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
INTERBOND CORPORATION OF AMERICA MITSUI & CO. LTD.
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, ET AL.,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Susan Illston
Paul P. Eyre Ernest E. Vargo Michael E. Mumford BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP PNC Center 1900 East Ninth Street, Suite 3200 Cleveland, Ohio 44114-3482 Telephone: 216.621.0200 Facsimile: 216.696.0740 firstname.lastname@example.org 6 email@example.com firstname.lastname@example.org Tracy Cole BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP 45 Rockefeller Plaza New York, NY 10111 Telephone: (212) 589-4210 Facsimile: (212) 589-4201 email@example.com LLP Attorneys for Defendant Mitsui & Co. (Taiwan), Ltd.
Master File No. 3:07-md-1827-SI
This Document Relates to Individual Case 20
STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME
(TAIWAN), TO RESPOND TO THE
COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Clerk's Action Required
STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME FOR MITSUI Case No. 3:11-cv-03763-SI TAIWAN TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT Master File No. 3:07-md-01827-SI
WHEREAS, plaintiff Interbond Corporation of America d/b/a BrandsMart USA ("BrandsMart") filed a Complaint in the above-captioned action against defendant Mitsui & Co. 3 (Taiwan), Ltd. ("Mitsui Taiwan"), among other defendants, on June 3, 2011. 4
Whereas, Plaintiffs and Mitsui Taiwan previously entered into a stipulation giving Mitsui Taiwan until October 6, 2011 to move to dismiss, answer, or otherwise respond to the Complaint. 6
(See Dkt. #12; MDL Dkt. #3366.) 7
WHEREAS, BrandsMart and Mitsui Taiwan have reached an agreement, pursuant to Civil Rule L.R. 6-1(a), pursuant to which Mitsui Taiwan shall have an additional extension until 9 December 1, 2011 in which to move against, answer, or otherwise respond to the Complaint.
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the undersigned counsel, on behalf of their respective clients, BrandsMart, on the one hand, and Mitsui Taiwan, on the other hand, that Mitsui Taiwan's deadline to move to dismiss, answer, or otherwise respond to the Complaint will be December 1, 2011.
Attestation: The filer of this document attests that the concurrence of the other signatories 8 thereto has been obtained.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.