Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Craig Yates, An Individual v. Mcdonald's #1462; Mcdonald's of

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


October 5, 2011

CRAIG YATES, AN INDIVIDUAL,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
MCDONALD'S #1462; MCDONALD'S OF
HAWAII DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, A
HAWAII LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,
DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Judge Thelton E. Henderson United State District Judge

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

The parties, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate to dismissal of this action in 18 its entirety with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1). Outside of the terms of the 19

Settlement Agreement and General Release ("Agreement") herein, each party is to bear its own 20 costs and attorneys' fees. The parties further consent to and request that the Court retain 21 jurisdiction over enforcement of the Agreement. See Kokonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511 U.S. 22

375 (1994) (empowering the district courts to retain jurisdiction over enforcement of settlement 23 agreements). 24

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between parties to this action through 25 their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice 26 pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure section 41(a)(1).

This stipulation may be executed in counterparts, all of which together shall constitute one 2 original document. 3 4

Dated: October 3, 2011 THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION 5 6 By: /s/ Thomas E. Frankovich Thomas E. Frankovich 7 Attorney for CRAIG YATES, an individual 8 9 10 Dated: October 4, 2011 BURNHAM BROWN 11 12 By: /s/ Brendan Brownfield Brendan Brownfield Attorneys for MCDONALD'S #1462; 13 MCDONALD'S of HAWAII DEVELOPMENT 14 15 COMPANY, a Hawaii Limited Partnership

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 19 Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction for the 20 purpose of enforcing the parties' Settlement Agreement and General Release should such 21 enforcement be necessary. 22

Dated: , 2011

20111005

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.