IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
October 5, 2011
DANIEL THOMAS HARVEY, PLAINTIFF,
CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE; EL DORADO COUNTY; ANDREW EISSINGER; CHARLES DUKE, DEFENDANTS.
This action, in which plaintiff is proceeding pro se, is before the undersigned in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Eastern District of California Local Rule 302(c)(21). On September 26, 2011, plaintiff filed a motion for a hearing. Dckt. No. 36. However, on September 27, 2011, the assigned district judge issued an order dismissing plaintiff's first amended complaint in its entirety, with leave to amend as to some of plaintiff's claims. Dckt. No. 35. Plaintiff has not yet filed a second amended complaint, as authorized therein. Therefore, there is currently no operative complaint in this action.
Accordingly, plaintiff's request for a hearing, Dckt. No. 36, is denied.*fn1