Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Daniel Thomas Harvey v. City of South Lake Tahoe; El Dorado County; andrew Eissinger; Charles Duke

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


October 5, 2011

DANIEL THOMAS HARVEY, PLAINTIFF,
v.
CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE; EL DORADO COUNTY; ANDREW EISSINGER; CHARLES DUKE, DEFENDANTS.

ORDER

This action, in which plaintiff is proceeding pro se, is before the undersigned in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Eastern District of California Local Rule 302(c)(21). On September 26, 2011, plaintiff filed a motion for a hearing. Dckt. No. 36. However, on September 27, 2011, the assigned district judge issued an order dismissing plaintiff's first amended complaint in its entirety, with leave to amend as to some of plaintiff's claims. Dckt. No. 35. Plaintiff has not yet filed a second amended complaint, as authorized therein. Therefore, there is currently no operative complaint in this action.

Accordingly, plaintiff's request for a hearing, Dckt. No. 36, is denied.*fn1


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.