IN THE UNITED STATED DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
October 6, 2011
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
JHONATAN SILVA CORONA, DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Anthony W. Ishii
CARL M. FALLER SBN: 70788 Attorney at Law Post Office Box 912 Fresno, CA 93714 Tel: 559-226-1534 Fax: 559-734-0867 carl.faller@fallerdefense,com Attorney for Defendant
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE; ORDER
Date: October 11, 2011 Time: 9:00 am
It is hereby stipulated by and between the parties hereto, through their respective attorneys of record, as follows:
A status conference is currently set in this matter for October 11, 20111 at 9:00 am.
By agreement of the parties, it is requested that the status conference be continued until October 24, 2011 at 9:00 am, for entry of guilty plea. A written plea agreement has been signed and filed in the case, but counsel for the defendant will be out of the county of the current date and the new date is the first available date when both counsel will be available.
It is further stipulated that the time between October 11, 2011, and October 24, 2011 shall be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act, Title 18, United States Code, Sections 3161(h)(7)(A) and (h)(7)(B)(iv), in that the ends of justice are served by such exclusion, and the defendant's and the public's interest in a speedy trial is outweighed by allowing continuity of counsel in that defense counsel must be in another county on the date currently set.
Based on the above, it is respectfully requested that the status conference be continued as set forth above.
Based upon the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing, it is hereby
ORDERED that the status conference and motions hearing currently set for October 11, 2011 at 9:00 am, be continued to June 20, 2011 at 9:00 am.
It is further ORDERED that the time between May 23, 2011 and June 20, 2011 shall be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act, Title 18, United States Code, Sections 3161(h)(7)(A) and (h)(7)(B)(iv), in that the ends of justice are served by such exclusion, and the defendant's and the public's interest in a speedy trial are outweighed by allowing for continuity of counsel in that defense counsel must be out of county on the date currently set.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.