UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
October 12, 2011
INNOVUS PRIME LLC, PLAINTIFF,
LG ELECTRONICS INC., ET AL, DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: The Honorable James Ware
JOSEPH E. THOMAS (State Bar No. 101443) email@example.com 2 WILLIAM J. KOLEGRAFF (State Bar No. 183861) ES DISTRI firstname.lastname@example.org THOMAS WHITELAW & TYLER LLP S O 18101 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 230 Irvine, California 92612-7132 Telephone: (949) 679-6400 N IS SO ORDERED 5 Facsimile: (949) 679-6405 W. PAUL SCHUCK (State Bar No. 203717) N email@example.com N Ware THOMAS WHITELAW & TYLER LLP R F Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 1350 San Francisco, California 94111 E A Telephone: (415) 820-0400 * Facsimile: (415) 820-0405 Attorneys for Defendant VIZIO, INC.
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT VIZIO, INC. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
Date of filing: August 26, 2011
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), Plaintiff Innovus Prime LLC and Defendant Vizio, Inc. ( Vizio ) agree to extend Vizio s time to respond or otherwise plead to Plaintiff s Complaint 24 for Patent Infringement (Docket No. 1) filed in this Court on August 26, 2011, up to and including October 25, 2011.
This change in time will not alter the date of any event or any deadline currently fixed by Court order. 28
Pursuant to General Order 45 section X(B), counsel for Vizio hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this stipulation has been obtained from the other signatory of this 3 document.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.