Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Allan Edgar Owens v. City of Sonora

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


October 14, 2011

ALLAN EDGAR OWENS,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
CITY OF SONORA, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Sheila K. Oberto United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER DENYING STIPULATED REQUEST TO MODIFY THE SCHEDULING ORDER (Docket No. 35)

On October 12, 2011, the parties filed a request to modify the scheduling order so that they would have additional time to complete discovery due to the ongoing cancer treatment of Defendant Officer Kevin Johnston. (Doc. 35.) The parties request the following changes:

Deadline Current Deadline Proposed Deadline

1. Non-Expert Discovery August 15, 2011 January 23, 2012

2. Expert Disclosure August 30, 2011 December 15, 2011

3. Supp. Exp. Discl. September 30, 2011 January 15, 2012

4. Exp. Discovery October 15, 2011 [None proposed]

5. Non-Disp. Filing Deadline November 10, 2011 December 16, 2011

6. Non-Disp. Motion Hearing December 14, 2011 January 20, 2012

7. Disp. Mot. Filing Deadline November 23, 2011 January 27, 2012

8. Disp. Motion Hearing December 12, 2011 April 16, 2012

9. Settlement Conference January 3, 2012 April 23, 2012

10. Pretrial Conference January 23, 2012 May 7, 2012

11. Trial Date February 28, 2012 May 29, 2012

The proposed deadlines do not leave sufficient time between the dispositive motion hearing date and the pretrial conference date for the Court to consider and make a determination on any pending motion, nor is there enough time proposed between the pretrial conference date and the trial date. Further, the parties did not propose an expert discovery deadline, and the proposed nondispositive motion filing deadline is prior to the proposed discovery cut-off date.

The Court is willing to accommodate the parties' request for a modified schedule, but cannot adopt the dates proposed in the stipulation. If the parties wish to re-file their request for an extension of the schedule, they should propose dates that maintain at least six weeks between the hearing date for the dispositive motions and the pretrial conference as well as at least six weeks between the date of the pretrial conference and the trial date. Further, they should propose an expert discovery deadline and may wish to consider proposing a non-dispositive motion deadline that falls after the non-expert discovery deadline.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20111014

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.