Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

In Re Immersion Corporation Securities Litigation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION


October 17, 2011

IN RE IMMERSION CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney

SUSAN S. MUCK (CSB NO. 126930) smuck@fenwick.com 2 JENNIFER BRETAN (CSB NO. 233475) jbretan@fenwick.com 3 MARIE C. BAFUS (CSB NO. 258417) mbafus@fenwick.com 4 FENWICK & WEST LLP 555 California Street, 12th Floor 5 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 875-2300 6 Facsimile: (415) 281-1350 7 JAY L. POMERANTZ (CSB NO. 209869) jpomerantz@fenwick.com 8 FELIX S. LEE (CSB NO. 197084) flee@fenwick.com 9 FENWICK & WEST LLP Silicon Valley Center 10 801 California Street Mountain View, California 94041 11 Telephone: (650) 988-8500 Facsimile: (650) 938-5200 12 LLP Attorneys for Defendants Immersion Corporation, RANCISCO Victor A. Viegas, Clent Richardson, Stephen A TTORNEYS Ambler and Richard Vogel

CLASS ACTION

This Document Relates to:

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ALL ACTIONS CONTINUING THE HEARING DATE ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS THE AMENDED CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT (Civil L.R. 7-12)

Date Action Filed: September 2, 2009

WHEREAS, on July 1, 2011, Defendants filed a Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Consolidated Complaint ("Motion to Dismiss") with a hearing date 3 scheduled in this Court for October 28, 2011 at 9:00 a.m; 4

WHEREAS, Lead Plaintiff filed his Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss on September 7, 2011; 6

WHEREAS, Defendants will file their Reply in Further Support of Defendants' Motion 7 to Dismiss on October 14, 2011; 8

WHEREAS, subsequent scheduling matters have now raised a conflict with the October 28, 2011 hearing date; 10

WHEREAS, in light of this scheduling conflict, Defendants have requested and Lead Plaintiff has agreed, subject to the approval of the Court, to continue the hearing date on 12 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss to December 9, 2011 at 9:00 a.m.;

IT IS ACCORDINGLY STIPULATED, pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-12, by and between undersigned counsel for the Parties that the hearing on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss currently set for October 28, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. be continued on the Court's calendar to December 9, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 7, before the Honorable Maxine M. Chesney. Good cause exists for 17 this continuation due to Defendants' counsel conflict with the hearing date.

Lead Counsel Plaintiff and the Proposed Class Pursuant to General Order No. 45 Section X(B), all of the signatories concur in the filing of this stipulation.

Dated: October 13, 2011 FENWICK & WEST LLP 24 By: /s/ Marie C. Bafus Marie C. Bafus

[PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, AND GOOD CAUSE SHOWING, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the hearing on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended 4 Consolidated Complaint currently set for October 28, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. be continued on the 5 Court's calendar to December 9, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 7, before the Honorable Maxine 6 M. Chesney. 7 8

Hon. Maxine M. Chesney United States District Court Judge

20111017

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.