Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Wyman Llp Attorneys & Counselors At Law Diana Engel, An Individual v. Wolfe &15washington Mutual Bank

October 17, 2011

WYMAN LLP ATTORNEYS & COUNSELORS AT LAW DIANA ENGEL, AN INDIVIDUAL,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
WOLFE &15WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, FA, A BUSINESS ENTITY, FORM UNKNOWN;
NATIONAL CITY BANK, A BUSINESS ENTITY, FORM UNKNOWN;
ALLIANCE TITLE COMPANY, A BUSINESS ENTITY, FORM UNKNOWN;
UNITED TITLE AND SETTLEMENT, A BUSINESS ENTITY, FORM UNKNOWN;
CALIFORNIA RECONVEYANCE COMPANY, A BUSINESS ENTITY, FORM UNKNOWN;
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., A BUSINESS ENTITY, FORM UNKNOWN; AND DOES 1-100, INCLUSIVE,
DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong U.S. District Court Judge

Stuart B. Wolfe (SBN 156471) sbwolfe@wolfewyman.com 2 Marcus T. Brown (SBN 255662) mtbrown@wolfewyman.com 3 WOLFE & WYMAN LLP 2175 N. California Blvd., Suite 645 4 Walnut Creek, California 94596-3502 Telephone: (925) 280-0004 Facsimile: (925) 280-0005 6 Attorneys for Defendant PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as 7 successor by merger to National City Bank (named as "National City Bank") 8

Assigned For All Purposes To: Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong

Courtroom 1 -- 4th Floor Date: October 26, 2011 Time: 2:30 p.m.

Place: By Telephone

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Defendant PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as successor by merger to National City Bank (named as "National City Bank") ("PNC"), Plaintiff DIANA ENGEL ("Plaintiff") and Defendant CALIFORNIA RECONVEYANCE COMPANY ("CRC") (collectively, the "Parties") 27 hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, the Initial Case Management Conference ("CMC") is scheduled to occur by 2 telephone on October 26, 2011;

WHEREAS, the Parties have met and conferred through their attorneys regarding the status 4 of the case and the upcoming CMC;

WHEREAS, PNC's motion to dismiss Plaintiff's complaint is under submission with the court;

WHEREAS, per the agreement of Plaintiff, CRC has not filed a response to the complaint, 8 and the case is not at issue;

WHEREAS, counsel for CRC reports that Plaintiff sold the subject real property on or about August 26, 2011;

WHEREAS, in light of the reported sale of the property, Plaintiff's counsel requires

WYMAN LLP Attorneys & Counselors At Law additional time to confer with his client regarding whether she wishes to continue to prosecute this 13 case; and

WHEREAS, given the foregoing, the Parties believe that it would be inefficient to hold the & WOLFE CMC on October 26 and that the case will not be ripe for scheduling ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.