Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States of America v. Barry Tortolero

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


October 18, 2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
BARRY TORTOLERO, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Court: The Honorable Edward M. Chen

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE OF CHANGE OF PLEA HEARING AND EXCLUSION OF TIME

Date: October 19, 2011 Time: 2:30 p.m.

The parties hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

1. This matter is set for a change of plea hearing on October 19, 2011 at 2:30 p.m.;

2. Counsel for Mr. Tortolero is scheduled to be in trial on October 19, 2011 and can no longer make the change of plea hearing;

3. Counsel for the government has been contacted and has no objection to the continuation;

4. The defense thus requests that the change of plea hearing be continued to October 26, 2011 at 2:30 p.m.

5. Further, and in light of the foregoing, the parties stipulate and jointly request that time be excluded from the Speedy Trial Act calculations from Wednesday, October 19, 2011 through Wednesday, October 26, 2011. The parties agree that the ends of justice served by granting such a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), (h)(7)(B)(iv)..

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: October 17, 2011 ELIZABETH M. FALK ASSISTANT FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER Dated: October 17, 2011 KATHRYN HAUN ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

For the reasons set forth above, the change of plea hearing in the aforementioned matter is hereby CONTINUED from October 19 , 2011 to October 26, 2011 at 2:30 p.m.

In addition, for the reasons stated above, the Court finds that an exclusion of time from October 19, 2011 through October 26, 2011 is warranted and that the ends of justice served by 7 8 the continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. See 18 U.S.C. §3161 (h)(7)(A).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

THE HONORABLE EDWARD M. CHEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

N M. Chen Judge Edward

20111018

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.