Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Universal Dyeing & Printing, Inc., A California Corporation v. Us Textile Printing

October 19, 2011

UNIVERSAL DYEING & PRINTING, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF,
v.
US TEXTILE PRINTING, INC.; ROSS STORES, INC.; UNO CLOTHING, INC.; CNC CLOTHING/ DBA: CANDY RAIN , DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Dean D. Pregerson United States District Judge

O

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' EX PARTE APPLICATION TO SHORTEN TIME AND DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SANCTION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE [Docket No. 184]

Presently before the court is Defendants' Ex Parte Application to Shorten Time for Hearing Defendants' Motion for Sanction of Dismissal with Prejudice Pursuant to FRCP 16(f) and Local Rule 83-7. The court grants Defendants' Ex Parte Application to Shorten Time and decides Defendants' Motion without argument.

According to the parties, neither side has fully complied with the court's pretrial orders or local rules. At issue in this motion, Plaintiff evidently filed certain pretrial documents one day late. While the court expects parties to comply fully with its orders and all local rules, Plaintiff's late filing does not rise to the level of warranting dismissal. The court therefore DENIES Defendants' Motion for Sanction of Dismissal with Prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20111019

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.