IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento)
October 19, 2011
THE PEOPLE, PLAINTIFF AND RESPONDENT,
TAMMY LYNN ASHWORTH, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
(Super. Ct. No. 10F08054)
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hull J.
P. v. Ashworth
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
Defendant Tammy Lynn Ashworth entered the Macy's at Sunrise Mall in Citrus Heights and took jewelry and other items without paying.
Defendant pled guilty to second degree burglary (Pen. Code, § 459) and waived all presentence credit. The trial court placed her on five years' formal probation under various terms and conditions.
Defendant appeals. She did not obtain a certificate of probable cause.
We appointed counsel to represent defendant on appeal. Counsel filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts of the case and requests this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised by counsel of the right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days elapsed, and we received no communication from defendant. Having undertaken an examination of the entire record, we find no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant.
The judgment is affirmed.
BLEASE, Acting P. J.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.