UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN FRANCISCO)
October 20, 2011
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
AU OPTRONICS CORP., ET AL.,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Edward M. Chen Judge
GEORGE RILEY (CA Bar No. 118304) email@example.com 2 DARIN SNYDER (CA Bar No. 136003) 3 firstname.lastname@example.org O'MELVENY &MYERS LLP 4 Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-3823 5 Telephone: (415) 984-8700 Facsimile: (415) 984-8701 6 7 MARK SAMUELS (CA Bar No. 107026) email@example.com 8 BRIAN M. BERLINER (CA Bar No. 156732) firstname.lastname@example.org 9 RYAN YAGURA (CA Bar No. 197619 email@example.com 10 MARCUS S. QUINTANILLA (CA Bar No. 202994) 11 firstname.lastname@example.org VISION L. WINTER (CA Bar No. 234172) 12 email@example.com O'MELVENY &MYERS LLP 13 400 South Hope Street Los Angeles, CA 90071-2899 14 Telephone: (213) 430-6000 15 Facsimile: (213) 430-6407 Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. and Related Parties 17
STIPULATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R.
6-1(A) FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR
SAMSUNG TO RESPOND TO AUO'S
AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS.
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(a), AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America (collectively, "AUO") and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and Samsung Electronics 3 America, Inc. (collectively, "Samsung") stipulate to extend the time within which Samsung is 4 permitted to answer or otherwise respond to the counterclaims asserted in this consolidated 5 action, including claims asserted in the Amended Complaint originally filed in Case No. 3:11-6 CV-03170-EMC, which has been consolidated herewith. The stipulated response date is 7 December 1, 2011. This will not alter any deadlines fixed by the Court. 8 9
Filer's Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X.B regarding signatures, Brian 10 Berliner hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the 11 other signatory listed below.
IT IS SO ORDERED
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.