Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Re: Carlin v. Wong

October 21, 2011

RE: CARLIN
v.
WONG,



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge Susan Illston

LAW OFFICES OF A C MICHAEL SATRIS SSOCIATE COUNSEL POST OFFICE BOX 337 MARGARET LITTLEFIELD BOLINAS, CA 94924 TEL: (415) 868-9209 FAX: (415) 868-2658 EMAIL: SATRIS@SBCGLOBAL.NET ES DIST

Clerk of the Court

APPROVED

R 450 Golden Gate Avenue O San Francisco, CA

To the Honorable Clerk:

By minute order filed September 27, 2011 (Doc. 53), the Court set a briefing schedule for respondent to file a motion to dismiss in this case as follows: motion due by October 7, 2011; opposition due by October 28, 2011; reply to opposition due by November 4, 2011. The Court set a hearing date of November 18, 2011.

Respondent filed his motion to dismiss on October 5, 2011 (Doc. 54), with the scheduled hearing date of November 18, 2011, on the motion. Apparently, the automatic e-filing system then supplied its own dates for subsequent briefing: opposition due on October 19, 2011, with any reply due by October 26, 2011.

On October 19, 2011, I spoke with a Clerk of the Court to point out the discrepancy. I was informed I should e-file a letter explaining that the briefing schedule for respondent's motion to dismiss had previously been set by the Court, and was different than the schedule automatically generated by the ECF system.

Respectfully,

20111021

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.