Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Thomas Goolsby v. M. Carrasco

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


October 24, 2011

THOMAS GOOLSBY,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
M. CARRASCO, ET AL., (DOC. 109) DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Jennifer L. Thurston United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER ADDRESSING INMATE WITNESS JAMES ALLEN'S LETTER REGARDING HIS ATTENDANCE AT TRIAL AND DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE A RESPONSE

On October 5, 2011, the Court received a letter from James Allen, which stated that he did not wish to testify in Plaintiff's trial, currently scheduled for November 21, 2011. (Doc 109). Based on Plaintiff's previous representation that Allen could provide relevant information which could "substantially further the resolution" of Plaintiff's case, the Court previous order (Doc. 83), granted Plaintiff's motion for the attendance of this witness. Wiggins v. County of Alameda, 717 F.2d 466, 468 (9th Cir. 1983).

In light of Inmate Allen's letter, Plaintiff is directed to file a responsive document indicating whether he still wishes to have Allen testify at trial.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20111024

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.