Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

In Re: Tft-Lcd (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation v. State of New York By and Through Eric T. Schneiderman

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION


October 25, 2011

IN RE: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
PLAINTIFF,
v.
STATE OF NEW YORK BY AND THROUGH ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL
DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Susan J. Illston

Richard L. Schwartz (NY Bar No. 1821081)* OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF NEW YORK 120 Broadway, 26th Floor New York, New York 10271 Telephone: 212-416-8282 (Richard L. Schwartz) Facsimile: 212-416-6015 Email: Richard.Schwartz@ag.ny.gov Counsel for Plaintiff State of New York

[Additional moving parties and counsel listed on signature pages] *Automatic Pro Hac Vice Admission Pursuant to Pretrial Order No. 1, Dated July 3, 2007 (Waiving Civil L.R. 11-3)

Judge Susan Y. Illston

ORDER

This Document Relates to

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] MODIFYING PRETRIAL SCHEDULE

AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, et al.,

WHEREAS the Parties have conferred regarding the schedule set in the Court's Order re: Pretrial and Trial Schedule (Dkt. 2165) and modified by stipulation on June 2, 2011 (Dkt. Case3:07-md-01827-SI Document4029 Filed10/26/11 Page2 of 6 Plaintiff State of New York and Defendants party to the above-captioned action (collectively, "Parties") hereby stipulate as follows:

STIPULATION

WHEREAS the Parties agree to the extension of dates set in the Pretrial and Trial Schedule in order to allow sufficient time for discovery and related work; NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties, through their undersigned respective counsel, stipulate and agree as follows:

3110) (the "July 12 Stipulation");

July 12 Stipulation, are hereby amended solely as to State of New York v. AU Optronics That the pretrial dates set forth in the Pretrial and Trial Schedule, as modified by the That the Parties shall meet and confer no later than December 31, 2011 to agree on a shall be considered as filed after December 1, 2010 solely for the purposes of the Pretrial and Corporation, et al., Case No. 11-cv-0711;

That State of New York v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al., Case No. 11-cv-0711, Trial Schedule, as modified by the July 12 Stipulation, and for no other purpose; modified pretrial schedule;

That service of opening expert reports in State of New York v. AU Optronics after entry of the modified pretrial schedule; and Corporation, et al., Case No. 11-cv-0711, will in no event be required earlier than four months

That service of opposition expert reports in State of New York v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al., Case No. 11-cv-0711, will in no event be required earlier than three months Case3:07-md-01827-SI Document4029 Filed10/26/11 Page3 of 6 after service of opening expert reports.

Dated: October 24, 2011

Respectfully submitted,

SO ORDERED Attestation: The filer of this document attests that the concurrence of the other signatories thereto has been obtained.

20111025

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.