Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Nano-Second Technology Co., Ltd., A Taiwanese Corporation v. Dynaflex International

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


October 25, 2011

NANO-SECOND TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., A TAIWANESE CORPORATION PLAINTIFF,
v.
DYNAFLEX INTERNATIONAL, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Ronald S.W. Lew Senior, U.S. District Court Judge

ORDER Re: Defendant Dynaflex International's Ex Parte Application to Strike Plaintiff NanoSecond's Supplemental Declaration and for Sanctions [50]

Before the Court is Defendant Dynaflex International's ("Defendant") Ex Parte Application to Strike Plaintiff Nano-Second's ("Plaintiff") Supplemental Declaration and for Sanctions [50]. Defendant requests that the Court strike a Supplemental Declaration that Plaintiff submitted four days before the Court's September 14, 2011 hearing on Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction. This Supplemental Declaration, however, was not pertinent to the Court's analysis on Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Accordingly Defendant's Ex Parte Application to Strike Plaintiff Nano-Second's ("Plaintiff") Supplemental Declaration is DENIED AS MOOT.

Furthermore, the Court DENIES Defendant's request for sanctions as the Court does not find that Plaintiff acted in bad faith in filing the Supplemental Declaration four days before the hearing.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20111025

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.