Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States of America v. Sohail Mohammad Amin

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


October 25, 2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
SOHAIL MOHAMMAD AMIN, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Morrison C. England, Jr. United States District Judge

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney MICHAEL M. BECKWITH Assistant U.S. Attorney 501 "I" Street, Suite 10-100 Sacramento, California 95814 Telephone: (916) 554-2797

AMENDED STIPULATION AND ORDER RESETTING STATUS CONFERENCE AND EXCLUDING TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

The United States of America, through its counsels of record, Benjamin B. Wagner, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of California, and Michael M. Beckwith, Assistant United States Attorney, defendant Sohail Mohammed Amin, through his counsel of record, Daniel Roth, Esq., hereby stipulate and agree that the status conference set for October 13, 2011, be continued to November 10, 2011.

The parties need additional time for preparation. Therefore, the parties have agreed and respectfully request that the Court set the date of November 10, 2011, for the status conference.

Accordingly, the parties stipulate that time be excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(F) and Local Code T4, United States Code section 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv), to give the defendant time to further review the discovery and to adequately prepare IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

UPON GOOD CAUSE SHOWN and by stipulation of all parties, it is hereby ordered that this matter be set for further status conference as set forth above.

Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, the Court finds excludable time as set forth above to and including November 10, 2011. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv); Local Code T4. The Court specifically finds that the ends of justice to be served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20111025

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.