Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Walter Wright v. Brake Masters Systems

October 25, 2011

WALTER WRIGHT,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
BRAKE MASTERS SYSTEMS, INC., A CORPORATION, AND DOES 1-100, INCLUSIVE, DEFENDANT.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. United States District Judge

STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING )

ORDER

The status (pretrial scheduling) conference scheduled for hearing on November 7, 2011, is vacated since the parties' Joint Status Report filed on October 21, 2011 ("JSR") indicates the following Order should issue.

DOE DEFENDANTS, SERVICE, JOINDER OF ADDITIONAL PARTIES, AMENDMENT

Plaintiff indicates in the JSR that he "will identify Doe Defendants by March 30, 2012." (JSR 2:8.) However, Plaintiff does not explain why this could not occur earlier. Therefore, Plaintiff has until January 17, 2012, to file a motion in which leave is sought under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a) to file an Amended Complaint substituting a named defendant in place of a Doe defendant. The referenced motion must be noticed for hearing on the Court's earliest available law and motion date.

No further service, joinder of parties, or amendments to pleadings is permitted, except with leave of Court for good cause shown. If leave is not sought as stated, Does 1 through 100 will be automatically dismissed from this action.

ADDED DEFENDANT'S OPPORTUNITY TO SEEK AMENDMENT OF THIS ORDER

If Plaintiff substitutes a named defendant in place of a Doe defendant, a copy of this Order shall be served on that defendant concurrently with the service of process.

That defendant has 30 days after said service within which to file a "Notice of Proposed Modification of Status Order." Although a newly-joined party's proposed modification filed within this thirty day period will not have to meet the good cause standard, no further amendments will be permitted, except with leave of Court for good cause shown.

DISCOVERY

All discovery shall be completed by October 31, 2012. In this context, "completed" means that all discovery shall have been conducted so that all depositions have been taken and any disputes relative to discovery shall have been resolved by appropriate orders, if necessary, and, where discovery has been ordered, the order has been complied with or, alternatively, the time allowed for such compliance shall have expired.

Each party shall comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(B) and (C)'s initial expert witness disclosure requirements on or before June 29, 2012, and any contradictory and/or rebuttal expert disclosure authorized under Rule 26(a)(2)(D)(ii) on or before July 31, 2012.

MOTION HEARING SCHEDULE

The last hearing date for a motion is December 17, 2012, commencing at 9:00 a.m.*fn1 A motion shall be briefed as ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.